Aiming for the more ambitious Paris Agreement climate goal of limiting human-induced warming to 1.5 °C rather than 2 °C could unintentionally weaken climate policy, argue the authors in this Comment published in Nature Geoscience. The authors suggest this goal could make the concept that a temperature target can be overshot for some time acceptable, and that such a relaxation could become a source for political flexibility, unless strict limitations on the temperature pathway to achieve the goal are implemented.
Previous research has suggested that meeting the 1.5 °C temperature goal that the parties to the Paris Agreement aspire to will most likely only be possible by allowing temporary warming in excess of that temperature, followed by aggressive mitigation to compensate.
However, Oliver Geden and Andreas Löschel write that broad acceptance for such a temperature overshoot scenario could undermine the perception of temperature targets as firm limits to warming. They suggest that climate scientists must define clear constraints to the acceptable magnitude, duration and end time for any period of overshoot, if they wish to ensure that mitigation targets are precise and evaluable, and to preserve political accountability.
Define limits for temperature overshoot targets
27 November 2017
Other Recent Journal Article / Working Papers

Establishment and lineage dynamics of the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic in the UK
Growth, development, and structural change at the firm- level: The example of the PR China

The economics of transition pathways: A proposed taxonomy and a policy experiment

How to accelerate green technology diffusion? Directed technological change in the presence of coevolving absorptive capacity

Social and racial inequalities in COVID-19 risk of hospitalisation and death across São Paulo state, Brazil
Intangibles within Firm Boundaries