02 March 2010
Journal of Risk Research Volume 13, Issue 2, pages 191 - 205 DOI: 10.1080/13669870903126267
View Journal Article / Working PaperThe article explores important methodological problems which arise when assessing risks with very low probabilities and very high stakes, and concludes that the risks involved in the LHC are larger than the official estimates.
Public vs Private Bodies: Who Should Run Advanced AI Evaluations and Audits? A Three-Step Logic Based on Case Studies of High-Risk Industries
The Dublin Declaration fails to recognize the need to reduce industrial animal agriculture
Open Problems in Technical AI Governance
Integrating Physical Climate Risks and Adaptation into Sovereign Credit Ratings
The Future of International Scientific Assessments of AI’s Risks
Impacts of climate change-related human migration on infectious diseases
If you found this page useful, sign up to our monthly digest of the latest news and events
Subscribe