The Oxford Martin Programme on

Security Futures

The Challenge

The Oxford Martin Programme on Security Futures explores how global security is being reshaped by climate change, artificial intelligence, pandemics and other systemic risks, and what this means for how societies understand and respond to risk in the 21st century.

Global military spending has almost doubled since the end of the Cold War. Is the world a safer place?

It is time to rethink our approach to global security, which is too often considered simply a matter of military strength: bigger defence budgets, stronger deterrence, harder borders. Those things can matter. But they no longer describe the full reality of what makes societies safe, prosperous and resilient.

In the 21st century, global security is increasingly shaped by risks still too often treated as peripheral, including climate change, pandemics, artificial intelligence, biodiversity loss and cyber risk.

This has created a dangerous mismatch between the way global security is commonly imagined and the way insecurity is actually experienced. Global military expenditure exceeded 2.7 trillion USD in 2024 – the highest level on record – even as climate shocks, pandemics and digital risks emerge as primary drivers of instability. Climate change is intensifying extreme weather, food insecurity and displacement. In 2022 alone, climate‑related disasters displaced around 32 million people, more than conflict. Pandemics and cyberattacks can spread across borders with extraordinary speed: COVID‑19 killed over 7 million people and cost the global economy roughly 12.5 trillion dollars.

These risks are especially dangerous because they do not occur in isolation. They interact and cascade across connected systems, turning localised shocks into national or global crises. These are examples of systemic risks, where shocks in one area can trigger instability across others. For much of the world, these are not abstract future risks: whether Africa, South Asia, Europe or Small Island Developing States, the consequences of cascading insecurity are already lived daily. Any serious rethinking of security must start from that reality, not from the vantage point of those most insulated from it.

Insecurity is also increasingly shaped by the digital environments through which people interpret the world. Platforms and algorithms reward outrage and division. AI makes it harder to tell what is real. That makes it easier for fear to be manipulated for political or commercial ends – and harder to build the public support that cooperation requires. Security today is not only about protecting territory or infrastructure. It is also about protecting the social and informational conditions on which societal resilience depends.

The world is heavily invested in the security of the last century while remaining underprepared for the kinds of insecurity that define this one. Without a broader and more integrated understanding of global security, governments risk continuing to respond to symptoms while neglecting the deeper drivers of instability.

 

Headshot of Achim Steiner wearing a dark jumper over a shirt

The Security Futures Programme is built for this moment: when geopolitical tensions are high but systemic risks are higher; when multilateralism is weak but the need for cooperation is urgent; when public trust is eroding but public agency is possible; when security thinking is dangerously narrow but the window to expand it remains open.

– Achim Steiner, Programme Director

Why now

This matters now because decisions on security, artificial intelligence, climate adaptation, and public health will shape global security for decades to come. If security frameworks do not expand to reflect these realities, crises will overlap, reinforce one another and become harder to contain. Cooperation is often presented as being at odds with national security, when in fact it is increasingly a condition of it. The task is not to dismiss conventional security concerns, but to place them within a broader and more realistic understanding of what security means in an interconnected age.

What makes the programme different

The programme is designed to be more than a research exercise. Over the next three years we plan to develop a global platform, the Security Futures Lab, to engage partners and the public on five continents. 

The aim is to shift how security is understood and debated: helping policymakers think about systemic risks in more joined-up ways, broadening public conversation about what security means, and making the case that systemic risks such as climate, health and digital / AI risks belong at the centre of security thinking, not at its margins.

Underpinning this is a commitment to building knowledge differently. Most security analysis still flows in one direction and reflects the assumptions of the institutions that produce it. This programme is designed to work against that tendency, drawing knowledge and engaging experts from across the world, shaping its research priorities based on their inputs, and co-producing knowledge with them as shared owners of a shared risk agenda. What emerges should look and feel different from what currently dominates the field: more plural in its perspectives, and more capable of reflecting the full range of risks that people actually face.

If you or your institution shares this ambition, or is working on questions that connect to it, please get in touch: securityfutures@oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk

Contact us