We investigate how competing business interests shaped congressional voting on the American Clean Energy and Security (ACES) Act of 2009. Merging establishment-level data with rollcall records, we find that districts with more carbon-intensive (“Brown”) firms were less likely to support ACES, while districts with more clean-tech (“Green”) firms showed higher support. Conservative representatives responded more strongly to local business interests, though mobilized public opinion could mitigate this effect. Using falsification tests and a Bartik-style instrument based on the shale-fracking boom, we demonstrate that our findings are robust and plausibly causal rather than coincidental.
Who Governs Climate Change? Business Interests and the American Clean Energy and Security Act
31 October 2025
Other Recent Journal Article / Working Papers
Advanced Characterization and Rejuvenation of End-Of-Life Lithium-Ion Anodes: Toward the Development of a Green Upcycling Route
Stranded assets in European agriculture during food system transformations
An Offshore Turn to Asia? Africa's Deepening Links with Dubai, Singapore and Hong Kong
Inclusion of wellbeing impacts of climate change: a review of literature and integrated environment–society–economy models
A Blueprint for Multinational Advanced AI Development
Food systems boundaries are currently poorly defined